The biggest insight I could give you without knowing your specific situation
would be this:

If you will be using MS VC++ always and forever and will not be
using/creating programs for any other platforms then use the VC++ add-in.

If you're going to be creating programs or even libraries for other systems
like Linux/Unix or Mac or whatever, then I would suggest using the ANSI C++
add-in.

(But then if you were going to be writing for many different OS's maybe Java
would do)

Not that you couldn't/shouldn't use VC++ to create libraries for other than
Windows systems, the compiler isn't as close to standard as some others may
be (although I understand VC7/VC.NET will be).

The benefit I see from ANSI C++ is the model/code can be "easily" (I know,
that's a relative term) transferred between Windows and other systems. For
instance, some create there architecture on Windows and then generate the
code and transfer the files to a Linux/Unix machine where they compile and
link for the final product.

Just my $.02,

JamesO

:> -----Original Message-----
:> From: Knight, David (MED) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
:> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:09 PM
:> To: 'Rose Forum'
:> Subject: (ROSE) ROSE C++ alternatives
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> In evaluating the use of Rose for round-trip engineering, I am
:> interested to learn more about the various advantages and 
:> disadvantages
:> of the following C++ alternatives for Rose:
:> 
:> - ANSI C++
:> - MS Visual C++
:> 
:> If anyone is familiar with the major differences between these two
:> options, what are some of your experiences?  Currently, our 
:> models are
:> not consistently assigned to one or the other and this can 
:> be confusing
:> in the least.  My basic observations thus far is that ANSI 
:> C++ is much
:> quicker than the MS Visual C++ tools, but ANSI C++ does not support
:> block comments.
:> 
:> I feel that it would be beneficial to standardize the C++ 
:> tool we use,
:> however it is difficult to decide and to convince anyone that it is
:> better than the other.
:> 
:> Any insight on this issue is greatly appreciated.
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> 
:> David Knight
:> ------------------
:> GE Medical Systems
:> Software Engineering Intern
:> (262) 521-6586
:> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:> 
:> *************************************************************
:> ***********
:> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
:> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
:> *
:> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:> * Archive of messages: 
:> http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
:> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:> *
:> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
:> *
:> * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:> * Subject:<BLANK>
:> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
:> *
:> *************************************************************
:> ************
:> 
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages: 
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to