Hi,
This was an excellent reply that helped me a lot.
I'm still curious why the associations have to be owned by packages. It
seems to be a feature of Rose and not a very nice one.
Wouldn't it be much easier (for users, at least) that classes owns their
associations? In case of bi-directional association both classes would own a
copy of the association (isn't that the case also in implementation in any
OO language). For read-only units one-way associations would be no problem
but I guess bi-directional associations might have some problems if other
unit is read-only.
-Tapio
***************************************************************
Tapio Taipale e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetHawk Solutions phone +358 (0)403 010 389
Elektroniikkatie 2 fax +358 (0)403 010 301
P.O. Box 100, 90501 Oulu, Finland
***************************************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kennedy, Patrick
> Sent: 11. syyskuuta 2001 20:44
> Subject: RE: (ROSE) Where to put the associations?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> relocating associations:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
