Hello,
only rose deletes method stereotypes on round trip. Typical case of one bug making another bug even more painfull :-(.
With kind regards
Martin
| "Gilliam, Jeffrey F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.11.01 22:37
|
An: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'Ricardo Giacomin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopie: Thema: RE: (ROSE) Static Methods |
What I do is set the stereotype to <<static>> to work around it.
> ----------
> From: Ricardo Giacomin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: Ricardo Giacomin
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:25 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: (ROSE) Static Methods
>
>
> Vishu,
>
> I tried it but still don't get the method name underlined.
> Any other hint? Do I have to set any option in Rose?
>
> Thank you,
> Ricardo.
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Annamalai Viswanathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:06 PM
> > > To: Ricardo Giacomin
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: (ROSE) Static Methods
> > >
> > >
> > > Ricardo,
> > >
> > > In older versions of Rose this would still work but you would
> > > have to prefix the
> > > operation name with the '$' on a diagram and not in the browser.
> > >
> > > Vishu
> > >
> > >
> > > Ricardo Giacomin wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is this true for any version of Rose? Mine is 2000e (build
> > > 7.0.9420.17) and
> > > > unfortunately all I get when prefixing method name with '$'
> > > is a different
> > > > name (regardless the method is a new or an existing one).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ricardo.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vance
> > > Christiaanse
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:42 AM
> > > > > To: Norris, Davyd
> > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: (ROSE) Static Methods
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Interesting!
> > > > >
> > > > > I wasn't able to make an existing method static by adding
> > > a '$' at the
> > > > > beginning of its name, all I got was new name.
> > > > >
> > > > > But, indeed, a new method entered with an initial '$' was
> > > > > underlined in
> > > > > the class icon and the '$' was not part of the name. The
> > > > > generated code
> > > > > for the method did not include "static" until I updated
> > the method
> > > > > specification explicitly. So the '$' effects the icon but the
> > > > > generated
> > > > > code is based on the specification. That's what Davyd Norris
> > > > > was trying
> > > > > to tell me...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Norris, Davyd" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Vance,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rose does underline static operations, but you have to tell
> > > > > it that the UML
> > > > > > operation itself is static - to the best of my knowledge it
> > > > > does not look at
> > > > > > any of the code generation pages to figure it out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you type the operation name starting with a '$' it will
> > > > > underline it for
> > > > > > you and set the operation to static. This notation is a
> > > > > hangover from the
> > > > > > old Booch days but is convenient since the UML has no
> > > simple textual
> > > > > > representation to distinguish types vs. instances.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is the need for an enhancement though - there is
> > > > > currently no way to
> > > > > > do this via any of the properties pages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dave.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Davyd Norris - Consultant
> > > > > > Regional Services Organisation (Asia Pacific)
> > > > > > Rational Software
> > > > > > Level 2, 459 Collins Street
> > > > > > Melbourne, Vic 3000
> > > > > > Australia.
> > > > > > Phone: +61 3 9613 9632
> > > > > > Fax : +61 3 9613 9699
> > > > > > HDesk: +61 2 9419 0111
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Vance Christiaanse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, 10 November 2001 7:31 AM
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: (ROSE) Concurrent Composite States Revisited
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rose fans,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm working on a list of "UML features that aren't>
> > > > > available in Rose".
> > > > > > > So far, the list has only two items:
> > > > > > > (1) Underline static operations in class diagrams.
> > > > > > > (2) Tile a state icon into regions with dotted lines
> > > to indicate
> > > > > > > concurrent composite states.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A workaround to (1) was suggested by Netherwood Paul: use a
> > > > > > > stereotype.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As a workaround to (2) it seems that one could simply
> > > > > leave out the
> > > > > > > dotted lines. Rose doesn't allow more than one start
> > > > > state in the same
> > > > > > > context so a synchronization fork could be used
> > instead. This
> > > > > > > is similar
> > > > > > > to figure 3-77 in the 1.4 spec except for the dotted lines.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vance
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vance Christiaanse
> > > > > > > Cintech Consulting
> > > > > > >
> > **************************************************************
> > > > > > > **********
> > > > > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > > > > > > * For technical support, visit
> > http://www.rational.com/support
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > * Archive of messages:
> > > > > > >
> > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> > > > > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > > > > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > >
> > **************************************************************
> > > > > > > ***********
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > **************************************************************
> > > > > **********
> > > > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > > > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > * Archive of messages:
> > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> > > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > *
> > > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > > > > *
> > > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > > > > *
> > > > >
> > > **************************************************************
> > > ***********
> > > >
> > > **************************************************************
> > > **********
> > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > > > *
> > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > * Archive of messages:
> > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > *
> > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > > > *
> > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > **************************************************************
> > > ***********
> > > >
> > > >
> > > **************************************************************
> > > **********
> > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > > > *
> > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > * Archive of messages:
> > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *
> > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > > *
> > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > > *
> > >
> > **************************************************************
> > ***********
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > Annamalai "Vishu" Viswanathan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Rose Technical Support Engineer
> > Rational WW Customer Service
> >
> > We value your feedback and encourage you to respond to the Rational
> > Customer Service survey you may receive regarding this case.
> >
> > ---
> >
> ************************************************************************
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> *
> * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Subject:<BLANK>
> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> *
> *************************************************************************
>
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
