Hi
I'm using Rose Enterprise Edition, v2001A.04.00 + patch 2 = v7.5.0103.1929 I've tried to use Rose to reverse engineer a VB project, but I guest the question will apply generally to other languages. I can see that if I in one class have a declaration like: "Dim oMyReference As Class1", and it is on module level (equ. Static) , Rose will generate an association from this class to Class1. However, if the declaration is within a sub or function it is completely ignored. 1) I assume that this is by design, but what are the arguments for this? (dictated by UML?) 2) I can't seem to find a description of the mapping rules in the online Help. Can anyone point me to them, or any other place where I can read about them? 3) Can I change these mapping rules myself? Thanks Erik ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
