Hi Pankaj , Here is what I think Since in your case both belong to a different System , and UC02_Sys_B is initiated by UC01_Sys_A so in a Use Case diagram for System B you will have System A(Actor) ----------------------------> UC02_Sys_B But tell me one thing is UC01_Sys_A complete without UC02_Sys_B ? Is there a <Uses> or <extends> relationship between them ? Depending on the relationship you may have draw Use Case Diagram of System A with System B as a actor.The arrow on both sides indicates that bidirectional information flow. UCO2_Sys_A <---------------------------------------> System B (Actor) Sudesh _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
--- Begin Message ---From: "Pankaj Chatterjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Pankaj Chatterjee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Rose Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: (ROSE) Actors - Use Case and Other System Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:43:08 +0600 Hi all, Suppose there are two systems Sys_A and Sys_B. Consider also a Use Case UC01_Sys_A in the Sys_A system. Now consider that an actor will initiate the UC01_Sys_A, this use case does some work and also raises an event that will cause some processing in Sys_B ( lets say UC02_Sys_B) . The question is the how to represent this situation? Understand that there are two models being generated, one for each system. Therefore from Sys_A point of view what is Sys_B and what is the event that the UC01 raises? >From Sys_B point of view who is the actor for UC02? Regards Pankaj ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:Hi Pankaj ,
Here is what I think
Since in your case both belong to a different System , and UC02_Sys_B is initiated by
UC01_Sys_A so in a Use Case diagram for System B you will have
System B(Actor) ----------------------------> UC02_Sys_B
But till me one thing is UC01_Sys_A complete without UC02_Sys_B ? Is there a <Uses> or
<extends> relationship between them ? Depending on the relationship you may have draw
Use Case Diagram of System A with System B as a actor.The arrow on both sides indicates
that bidirectional information flow.
UCO2_Sys_A <---------------------------------------> System B
------------------
Sudesh
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum *************************************************************************
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum ************************************************************************* --- End Message ---
