> I would like to reverse engineer some Java classes with instance variables
> of datatype String. When I do this, Rose generates an association, not a
> field. If I manually enter fields into a Rose class model, I can set the
> datatype to String or any other Java class. Can I reverse engineer Java
> and have Rose create class model fields with a String datatype?
>
> P.S. If I generate Java code from a Rose class definition definition
> containing String fields, and then reverse engineer the java source back
> into Rose, I get an association and the field disappears.
>
P.P.S. I am using Rose 98 Enterprise Edition
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
* http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: <BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************