Re: (ROSE) XML_DTD in Rose 2001

[Don Eddleman]

I not sure what problem you encountered but I know that there was a bug in the 2001 version of Rose that is claimed to be fixed in 2001a update (just installed so can't claim that the fix works yet.) The problem was that Rose did not maintain the order of the elements specified in the DTD and hence you could end up with invalid definitions. If this is not what you ran into, post a sample and more detail. Don Marie Renaud wrote: Hi all' I've done a model with XML DTD in my classes diagram and then I've used Reverse-Engineering of this DTD to compare my model and the generated one. My problem is : it's not really the same... I don't know if I've done a right model with my DTD and its elements, stereotypes...  I've found just one document about that on the Rational Rose web site.Does anyone have more information about that, or does anyone have any sample of Rose models using DTD?thanks in advance! Marie