We are attempting to intermix reverse engineering of code into our model
with class digrams that have descriptive associations (can be thought of as
business domain associations). These descriptive associations are used in
high level diagrams in our specification documents. The problem is that the
each time we reverse engineer the code back into the model, it removes the
descriptive associations.
For example, a Parent has a number of Children and this is implemented in
the code as a java.util.Vector which is a member variable of the parent. As
the Vector is untyped there is no obvious association between the Parent and
it's Children, so we would like to add an association to the model which
represents that relationship. Attempting to reverse engineer the code will
remove the descriptive association.
Does anybody know how to get Rose to stop removing the descriptive
associations ?
,
Richard Long
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
* http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: <BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************
