Hi,

In reponse to your first question: - I'm not sure that Letter should be an
actor.  Actor 1 seems to initiate the use case, so the use case would look
like your first example, except without the letter.  actor1-------->(write
letter)

The actual letter would not be an actor because it is created in a use case
within the system/problem domain.  Actors are roles or other systems outside
of the domain of the system under analysis or design.  The letter does not
seem to interact with the system/problem domain, it is the result of the
successful completion of use case "Write Letter".

Hope this helps,

Tara.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: qazmlp0912 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 12:15 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      (ROSE) Asscoaiation relations, names
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not clear about showing the association between an actor and the
> usecase.
> 
> 1.
> actor1 writes a letter. 
> ----------------------
> In the above case there are 2 actors: actor1 and letter
> 1 usecase: write letter
> 
> How does the usecase diagram looklike?
> 
> actor1-------->(write letter)----->letter
> 
> or
> 
> actor1<-------(write letter)<-----letter
> 
> or something else?
> 
> 
> 2. Is <<uses>> association replaced by <<include>> in UML standard? Can we
> still use <<uses>> in our usecase diagrams?
> 
> 3. What about the name of the associations? Can we assign any name or it
> should be one of the standard association names(uses, include, includes
> etc.)? 
> 
> ************************************************************************
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages:
> *    http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> *    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *    Subject: <BLANK>
> *    Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> *************************************************************************


JBWERE  LIMITED
DISCLAIMER

JBWere Limited and its related entities distributing this document and each of their 
respective directors, officers and agents ("the  Were Group") believe that the 
information contained in this document is correct and that any estimates, opinions, 
conclusions or recommendations contained in this document are reasonably held or made 
as at the time of compilation. However, no warranty is made as to the accuracy or 
reliability of any estimates, opinions, conclusions, recommendations which may change 
without notice) or other information contained in this document and, to the maximum 
extent permitted by law, the Were Group disclaims all liability and responsibility for 
any direct or indirect loss or damage which may be suffered by any recipient through 
relying on anything contained in or omitted from this document.



************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
*    http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*    Subject: <BLANK>
*    Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************

Reply via email to