HI Pablo,
Actors are not necessary humans. You can have actors that represent other
systems like an "invoicing system" and the methods that you make appear
will give be the messages sent from your system to the other system.
As for human actors, you should not have messages that go to them. Can you
give some example?
best regards,
Raphaël Faudou
Inexware
"Pablo Schor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Rose Forum (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
Sent by: Fax to:
owner-rose_forum@ra Subject: (ROSE) Actor with methods??
tional.com
22/01/2002 05:10
Please respond to
"Pablo Schor"
Hi, this is a question about UML. Drawing a sequence diagram, messages
addressed to actors represent methods, but actors are human, how can they
have methods ?
Sorry if it's an easy one.
Does anyone know about a UML mailing list? - not just rose.
Thanks,
Pablo
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
* http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: <BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
* http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: <BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************
