(responding to Jo�o Paulo Marto Pereira)
> I've got three classes. Lets call the Human, Man Woman. I know a could > derive human and woman out of human. But I want to say that a human is > associated with Man OR with woman. But never with both. There is a notation > for that in the UML User Guide. Can Rose solve this problem?? Ive seen previous responses, and there are a couple of adequate solutions. However, I would recommend questioning seriously why you don't want to have Human as a generalisation of Man and of Woman. After all, Man Is-A Human, and Woman Is-A Human, and the generalisation relationship is one that implements Is-A relationships. Paul Oldfield any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Mentors of Cally ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: <BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum *************************************************************************
