Hi All, I am planning to use the Robbust Analysis approach(boundary,control,entity),before I go to detail design. I have a problem Naming/representing the control objects in rose.
1)As far as i know,I think Control/controllers are the classes which hold the business rule/logic. They act as a mediator between boundary and the entity objects and also between 2 non communicating entity objects. Is my understanding correct. I am having hard time in determining how do you name a control object.Is it by the task it is supposed to perform or a generic business name. If you name them by process,then I need to integrate them later when I go to the detailed design as a controller can perfrom multiple tasks. Do we bridge this classes later at design time. Thanks for the response. Gopi _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: <BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum *************************************************************************
