I too have Rose 2001 Professional and am having a hard time with this. I've tried both ways, but wonder if I am misinterpreting. Will the diagram containing the super-package also show the sub-package?
From: Hebert, Marc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Wed Apr 11 2001 - 08:46:05 EDT Eric, ��������I see what you mean by the subpackage being moved into the super package, and I think this is actually good. The other way (by putting the diagram outside the super-package), my packages doesn't get moved inside the browser. If the package is already under the super package then this doesn't cause a problem. But if its a package that was under a different tree structure and that you want to move it under that particular package then it could become useful. Of course you could easily do this by just using the browser. My preference would be that the class diagram would respond like the the browser when moving a package on top of another (move the package from the old path to the new path if it is not already there). ��������Also I have Rose 2001 and it does the same thing like Rose98 it seems, *but won't drop directly onto the super-package in the diagram*. So if you do it like this you then have to drag and drop it again outside the diagram like you said. Thanks guys, Marc -----Original Message----- From: Eric D. Tarkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:20 AM To: ROSE_FORUM Subject: Re: (ROSE) packages within packages This may just be Rose 98, but the trick to putting a package into another package is a little more complicated than what Mr. Hanslip wrote: 1. Drag the super-package from the browser to the (class) diagram. 2. Stretch it. 3. Drag-and-drop the sub-package to a place in the diagram *outside* the super-package. 4. Drag the sub-package onto the super-package. Dragging from the browser and dropping directly into the super-package has annoying side-effects (in Rose 98, at least: the sub- is moved into the super-package in the *browser*, but won't drop directly onto the super-package in the diagram). -Eric > "Hanslip, David" wrote: > > Marc, > > You can do this in Rose, but there's a trick to it. Click and drag the > package from the browser onto the diagram first. Stretch it. Click and > drag the sub-package from the browser over the top of the package > image on the diagram. The packages have to be added to the diagram in > this order. > > Dave. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hebert, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 11 April 2001 9:04 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: (ROSE) packages within packages > > I am trying to reproduce something I see time and > time again in UML books. They show a package with > sub-package inside it graphically. So you have a large > graphic of a package containing a bunch of smaller > packages. Is this possible to do within Rose? > > I'd like to be able to divide the architecture in > layers and show the depencies between sub-systems from > different layers. > > Marc ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: <BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum *************************************************************************
