rose forum,
I have a number of sub systems in the model, stereotyped as
<<subsystem>>. To make Use-Case realizations and check how sub
systems implement architecture significant use-cases using
sequence diagrams, I have to have a type for every sub system.
While, Rose and possibly UML does not allow treating package as
a <<Type>> class (while at the meta...-..-model it is the Class),
what are ways to dot his?
Maybe I have to define a type for every partition?
Maybe I have to define interface or boundary class for such
purpose?
The primary goal is to describe conceptual architecture (in
analysis words, without taking into detail implementation
languages).
Thanks, in advance.
Best Regards, Alexey Meledin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.-------
<Good enough for each part is usually best for>
<the whole system. When one part is maximized >
<then there are inevitable losses for other...>
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
* Only plain-text messages are supported.
* HTML or Rich-Text messages may be rejected.
*
* Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
* http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject: <BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*************************************************************************
