On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Andrei Picus <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Mihai Maruseac <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrei Picus >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Mihai Maruseac >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Andrei Picus >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Laura Vasilescu >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/4/23 Andrei Picus <[email protected]>: >> >> >> > But it's way better >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 1 mai (by including this I made it relevant to the topic) >> >> >> >> >> >> Mulțumim, Andrei >:D< >> >> >> >> >> >> Tocmai doream să ne luăm de voi (conform ultimei reguli din >> >> >> Constituție >> >> >> [0] ) >> >> >> >> >> >> Deci, cine mai vine de 1 mai la grătar? :) >> >> >> >> >> >> [0] - >> >> >> http://lists.rosedu.org/pipermail/offtopic/2011-April/000243.html >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Regulile alea sunt doar pentru fetele din ROSEdu, and no! long >> >> > (blonde) >> >> > hair >> >> > =/= girl >> >> > >> >> > And now on topic, I'll probably pass in favor of bbq@home >> >> >> >> A se observa ce operator de inegalitate a folosit:D >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> http://lists.rosedu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rosedu-general >> > >> > You caught me :D =/= looks funkier than != >> >> Era o remarcă pozitivă. I like =/= better than !=. >> >> De fapt, cât timp nu folosești (not (eqv? a b)) e ok :D > > De ce as face asta, as folosi (and (not (< a b)) (not (> a b))) >
Păi vezi că (not (a < b)) && (not (a > b)) (scris și all . map not [a < b, a > b]) funcționează doar dacă a și b sunt instanțe ale Ord _______________________________________________ http://lists.rosedu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rosedu-general
