On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 7:56 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2003 21:37, Chris Cannam wrote: > > On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 7:24 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > > > [...] I'm tempted to go ahead > > > and make the above changes anyway > > > > In fact I'm definitely going to do that now, as it's annoying me > > so much that this part of the design is so obviously wrong. > > Actually it's obviously not finished yet. So I'd really appreciate > it if you could let me go through my current idea and leave my code > alone for the moment. Please ?
Well, the obvious reason I'm looking at this at all (apart from that I think the current design is basically wrong in the one or two ways) is that I've been trying to get to the bottom of a rather serious crashing bug. Anyway, I'm half way through this change, but what I'll do is send a patch to the list when I'm finished rather than committing anything. Then we can debate the pros and cons of that. I will admit that there certainly are cons -- e.g. I just discovered the reason you describe in your previous email for why you added the view element observer. It can be worked around but that also has some disadvantages. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
