On Friday 27 June 2003 5:05 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > Richard Bown wrote: > > On Friday 27 June 2003 4:36 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > >> * Sort out what to do about ALSA ports -- do we create one per > >> connection so that people can use aconnect? That could be > >> quite a bit of work. Also some careful work needed with things > >> like device names and instrument handling, which still isn't > >> really done right. > > > > I think it's fine as it is really. > > Which part?
Oh sorry - I forgot to go back to that part of the reply. I s'pose what I mean is it works well now for the easy cases and it should just be a low priority. > Yeah. First I'll get the experimental branch actually playing again. > I can handle the CVS merge when the time comes -- it will take a > little care but I know how to approach it. We need to bear in mind that moving the metronome and event filtering down to the sequencer at that stage might well makes a lot of sense too (and the whole shared mem thing more efficient). Or not. Indeed as for other asynchronous events - we can just use the existing sendMappedEvent over DCOP (as they at least are non blocking). There is still _one_ remaining DCOP contention issue to do with picking of audio plugin whilst playing. I'm presuming that once we've got rid of the frequent blocking calls() (getSequencerSlice()) then this will sort itself out too. R ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
