On Saturday 26 July 2003 15:01, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > segment's mmapping to be refreshed. Are there any operations from the > track editor which require this ?
Many. > > I don't get this part. They all have (sorry, had) separate > > had ? EditViews no longer have seperate refresh-status IDs ?? Sorry -- they do still have them; I was changing my tense because I realised I was describing a usage of them that no longer happened (i.e. using them for the segment mmap thing). I changed tense too early in the sentence, I guess. > > mechanism for Devices works OK already -- I have been thinking of > > making it use shared-memory to do the bulk device dump, but that's > > a quite different matter, the basic protocol would stay the same). > > By shared-mem do you specifically mean SysV shm() stuff, or mmapped > files ? Jeepers no, I meant mmapped files. They're a shared-memory technique, and that was all I'd intended to convey. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
