Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Tuesday 05 August 2003 16:37, Chris Cannam wrote: > >>without bothering to catch the exception that sequencerCall might >>throw, is asking for trouble. > > Yes, but we should catch the exception at a higher level.
Fine -- though in that case the exceptions should probably have a more specific type than just Rosegarden::Exception. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
