On Sunday 14 September 2003 03:00 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Saturday 13 September 2003 10:42, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > None of us uses gcc 3.3 at the moment. I haven't looked very closely > > at the problem yet, so I'm not sure on which side the bug is. > > I've stared at it for a bit and I can't see a fault in our code there. > But if the gcc library code was at fault, I would have expected to find > similar problems elsewhere too. I must be missing something.
I'm not following this, really, but I've been building with gcc 3.3 for many moons now, without jumping through any special hoops. I'm not sure what my version might have been in the past, but the one I've got today is 3.3.1, and I did a distclean rebuild earlier this morning uneventfully. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 Confirmed post number: 17736 Approximate word count: 532080 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
