Chris Cannam wrote:
> Richard Bown wrote:
>> We really need a way of streaming bugs and FRs by release or something.
>
> Workflow is not a strong point of the SourceForge bug tracker.
> I find the Mantis bug list page (as used for Ardour etc) rather more helpful.
> It distinguishes between severity and urgency (for schedule) and makes clear
> what the various scheduled fix times mean ("next tarball",
> "next major release" etc). Not exactly rocket science, as they say -- I've
> used other systems that have done the same and that I can't even remember
> the names of -- just odd that SourceForge is more limited.
> Still, at least it's not Bugzilla.
Have any of you got a Sourceforge subscription?
It seems to have at least one useful service
in its so-called "Advanced Search" which seems to have
Boolean searching and the ability to "Search all aspects of a project
at once. (pervasive search across Trackers (Support Requests, etc.)
and discussion forums)." (https://sourceforge.net/subscription.php).
It might make searching the RG bug reports and RFEs slightly easier.
It's still a long way short of providing a really flexible bug reporting system
like Mantis. Even Mantis, I think, doesn't have any way of grouping
bug reports by the functionality affected.
William
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
