Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > > And there is a big difference between a technician, who sometimes experiments > with music, and a musician, who writes score for his daily bread and butter > ;) E.g. technically minded people do not seem to care about usability > issues as long as their work and their salary doesn't depend on it and > it usually doesn't depend on Rosegarden's usability, right? :) > > Kudos to William and other people who are tirelessly bug-reporting and > feature-requesting.
Thanks, I hope the reports are useful. I have found a lot of bugs in Rosegarden only because I use it a lot (I compose a lot of classical music, as well as working in a technical area). > Wiki is an amazing infrastructure for discussing various solutions > (with its cons, of course) Yes, it is. >> > for now I see different approaches to solution of one problem >> > within Rosegarden in several places I like having these choices in RG. > Rosegarden is now the only MIDI sequencer with audio capabilities for > Linux which has notation editor. MusE team dropped it, se24 will never > have it, Tim Orford's planned application has no code yet and Tim > did'nt show interest in a notation editor, Ardour -- maybe someday. > Other sequencers just have died out. If you don't need audio then NoteEdit is another Linux application which has a powerful notation editor: http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html William ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
