On Saturday 07 Aug 2004 07:51, Richard Bown wrote: > On Friday 06 August 2004 18:21, William wrote: > > That is not what a circular argument means. > > Sheesh, I never thought I'd see the day where Chris was out-pedanted.
If I was being pedantic, I could point out that I didn't use the term "circular argument". But you're right, William's better at this sort of logical argument than I am. Not that that necessarily means he's right. My line here is essentially: I dislike wikis for various rational and irrational reasons; in the cases where I've seen them deployed for things I've been involved with, they've largely failed, or at least succeeded no better than I believe any other web page would have; when they fail, they are a more depressing thing than a poorly updated web page. I have never wished to deploy one for Rosegarden. There does seem to be a reasonable amount of support for other views though. Ultimately, if someone else wanted to implement one -- and by that I mean propose and construct a sensible structure and create some starting content, not just install the software -- I probably wouldn't actually object, and I would even provide hosting for it on rosegardenmusic.com if so desired (assuming my ISP ever manages to plug that security hole!), and I would contribute to it. But I won't implement one myself. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
