On Friday 22 October 2004 12:58, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Friday 22 Oct 2004 11:10, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > As I said I'd suggest 1.0rc1, but that might be a bit too bold ?
>
> It would be pre1 anyway, not rc1 -- the principle [...]
OK.
> Definitely. There are probably a few just waiting for confirmation and
> closing, too.
None attributed to me, are there any I can confirm and fix ?
> Suggested priorities (though obviously use your common sense):
Looks fine to me, let's make these official. I'll take a look at the
non-attributed bugs this w-e and try to prioritize some of them.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
