On Sunday 13 Feb 2005 22:49, Vladimir Savic wrote: > > A better ruler would have two large ticks, and three smaller ticks > > within each space. Rosegarden's just has the two larger ticks. > > Yes, I was just about to say that, but you ware faster. That's how we > could mark complex time signatures. Display all tick lines and make > main (requested) devision stronger (bold). That also means beaming > would be as requested time signature says. :)
The fact that beaming is sometimes wrong is a separate issue -- that's just poor beaming code. (Aside: the auto-beaming code is the oldest part of the current Rosegarden. Not only was it copied straight from Rosegarden 2.x, it was already one of the oldest bits of that.) Our time signature code does already know about divisions and subdivisions, as you can see from the metronome configuration, and it's quite capable of being used to add the subdivision ticks to the ruler where necessary. The less immediately obvious part is stating which time signatures should only be shown with primary subdivisions (e.g. 4/4) and which should have secondary divisions as well (e.g. 6/8). Maybe we should just show secondary divisions in dotted times and not otherwise. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
