On Sunday 15 May 2005 11:18, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Sunday 15 May 2005 12:09, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Guillaume -- sorry to be a bother when you've just applied this, > > but I evidently hadn't reviewed it well before. Any chance you > > could revert? > > *sigh*. Sorry, I thought this part was ok with you, I'll revert it.
Thanks. I think I just hadn't read through the patch that far. The stuff in base/ looks fine, and I don't remember any problems in the C++-only bits in gui/. Funny really -- avoiding compiler warnings can be a surprisingly tricky thing to do. I had a phase of doing that a while ago (when we briefly toyed with doing daily builds with -Werror) and I won't object to others trying it, but at the time I reckoned there were always going to be diminishing returns for fixing the last few warnings -- too easy to break something, too hard to fix correctly, not necessarily any real bug in the first place. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
