On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:27 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > Actually this script has been heavily edited by Thomas (the author of > bksys, who's been kind enough to send updated versions of our scripts when > he updated his own code). I don't know if I missed it in the first place or > if bits got lost during the various updates.
No accusation implied in either event. It looks like a pretty nice piece of work, actually, now that I've poked around with it a bit. It sure beats putting the right bits into all the weird little .in and .am files and praying everything comes out right on the other side, doesn't it? The install is less brain damaged too, except for the whole umask thing. Whine whine whine. > Commit what ? There wasn't anything attached to your message. If it works > just go ahead and commit. No, there wasn't. I wasn't asking you to look over my shoulder so much as making sure you didn't have some intention to be the sole proprietor of the new build system or whatever. I found another even more serious problem, so I just committed it. I'll see what else I can turn up too, along the way. I'm expecting there are probably more of these missing defines, but I haven't found anything else broken yet. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
