Are we going to ditch autotools entirely for the next release, or support both build systems?
I ask because there's currently a pretty nasty inconsistency -- various files still need to #include "config.h" to work with autotools, but scons doesn't update config.h, so we can end up with with symbols defined with different values in different places. (I assume our scons setup has some logic to at least create config.h if it doesn't exist, otherwise these files would fail to build, but it doesn't ensure that it's correct if it does exist.) For example, I just built a system with scons that was last built a while ago with make. It had a different version number in config.h from the one in the scons configuration. The result was a few warnings at compile time, and then a complete, apparently successful build that refused to run because it had the wrong version number. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
