Peter Mogensen wrote: > I was thinking that it could be relative simple to add primitive > understanding of repeats to RG without actually doing a lot with the > notation editor, if you could only make the same segment appear more > than one place depending on flags set on the segment. > I don't know how that code looks like, so I'm just asking ? > > I was thinking somthing in the line of: > > * There's already a repeat flag. This could be expanded to include a > repeat count. > * A "voltarepeat" flag could be added, which causes the segment to be > repeated only after the next (volta) segment. > * You could actually also support D[SC] al (Fine|CODA) in that way by > setting attributes on segments and allowing for placing "Fine" and CODA. > > Would this be a daunting task? > Is it a bad way to do it?
Oh... I just realized that it's not as simple... (damn, why do these thoughts always come up _after_ you've send the mail) It would probably not be a good solution to have this only work on a per-track basis. You could end up having repeats overlapping each other in time if you're not carefull. So maybe it would require some kind of global repeat-administration track, which forced a structure on other tracks? Peter ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
