"Peter Mogensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In notation this would be: Segments between the first and second > instance are "1. Volta" IFF they are marked with a "volta" tag. If not, > then the repeat is just written out. The first segment after the > "shadow" instance is "2. Volta" IFF there was a "1. volta". ... and so > on.
That makes sense. I think. > So to do a drum fill you would just place the drum fill segment, and > then shadow-copy your rythm-segment after it. This would just be written > out in notation as: "rythm", percent-repeat, drum fill, rythm, > percent-repeat. Sorry, what do you mean by "percent-repeat"? While I'm asking questions -- do you think one ever finds situations in which one part needs to have a repeat (or related thing) while other parts do not? We've been talking about how it's a bit of a pain to have to put repeats in every track when you really want to repeat the whole thing, but does it ever happen that you'd _need_ the repeats to be in individual tracks and a "global" time-flow mechanism would be inadequate? Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
