On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:57 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Thursday 28 Sep 2006 21:46, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > On Thursday 28 September 2006 12:25, Chris Cannam wrote: > > > One small problem with this reorganisation -- the sheer quantity of > > > includes you end up with. > > > > Perhaps we could still keep some together, like the commands for > > instance. Splitting those in seperate includes won't help much, will > > it ? > > I don't know. The problem is how to group them. The command headers we > have at the moment are not terribly satisfactory. > > We could have SomeGroupOfCommands.h that just includes a bunch of the > other headers.
I believe I have seen this in packages like Boost and OpenGL GLUT and GLU libraries. Its a fine solution in my opinion. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
