On Monday 11 Dec 2006 14:34, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > 2006/12/11, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On the other hand, I do think we have enough material for a new feature > > release soon. Call it 1.5.0? > > I agree. I would give it a name that differs from the naming of the > development versions. Therefore, 1.6.0.
Er, actually I was thinking more along the lines of "have we done enough to call it 1.5.0, or should we call it 1.4.5 or something?" Of course the fact that it's labelled 1.5.0-svn internally suggests we probably ought to number it at least 1.5.0. But I do like to feel we can choose our version numbers based on meaningful things, like how much the program has changed, rather than just have them flow inevitably onwards or base them on some artifact of the development process. And let's face it, 1.5 is an attractive number. I like it better than 1.6. Anyone else have an opinion on this, er, hugely important subject? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
