(Thanks for forwarding that. I realise probably nobody else wanted to read it, but I didn't want to forget what I was thinking about.)
On Saturday 30 Dec 2006 15:04, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > > - (else) if the file refers to audio files and the > > current JACK samplerate differs from the "expected" > > rate as above, if any, show a warning (with the > > expected rate in it). > > And some offer to fix it somehow. Offer to resample the existing > files for me to match the current rate, or suggest I go reconfigure > JACK or something. I thought about offering to resample, but I think it's probably infeasible. There are too many ways it can go wrong, and it may take an eternity, it's likely to be a huge waste of disk space, and we don't want to encourage people to keep resampling because it's a lossy operation (not usually audibly, but still). And anyway it'd be a pain to code. I think we'd better recommend reconfiguring JACK. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
