On Thursday, 15 March 2007 23:19, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Thursday 15 Mar 2007 21:24, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > Although there are distros that include the Rosegarden documentation > > "Although there are distros..."? You say that as if it was optional! > > Every distro package of Rosegarden should have the documentation. It's > more important than half of the features.
It was my intention to be sarcastic. > > I would propose to publish the Rosegarden Handbook online. > > This is a good idea, though. Apart from anything else it's useful to be > able to read it before getting hold of the program at all. > > Now, if only we had worked out how to-- > > > Commands to produce the HTML version (single index.html file) > > Hooray! > > Though I prefer the multi-file kde-chunk.xsl -- any reason we shouldn't > use that? Not really. There is a stylesheet reference at the top of each page that should be fixed (or removed) before putting them online. Regards, Pedro ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
