The new accidental code seems to be working nicely. I haven't done much with the improved transpose yet. I'm not sure how it's supposed to work, or what I should be looking to test.
I'm wondering about a real-world situation, and the best strategy for handling it. It might even suggest a feature enhancement. I have a -2 part I want to port to a -9 instrument as effortlessly as possible. I wonder if we have a clean, convenient way to do this now, putting together various of our recent improvements, and if so, how should I do it, step by step? The part is in a -2 segment with a key of Bb. It needs to go to -9 with a key of F. I guess this is concert Ab, so if I change the segment from -2 to -9, then double click the Bb key signature, put in an Ab, and pick my new transpose options to move it relative to segment transposition, then the math should come out right, and it should wind up at F. I think. But in this situation, I don't "know" what the concert key is without doing some mental math. The whole piece is full of transposed segments, and I arranged the whole thing from a mental "home base" of -2 instead of concert pitch. That adds a layer of confusion to the process. Just thinking out loud about this more than anything else. I already managed to get it there, but I feel like I should have been able to do it a lot more easily. Maybe remembering the concert key, as in the example above, was the key I missed to performing this action in a simple, direct manner. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
