On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I saw Chris, you added the createAction() method per file/window. > What about a centralized approach (include file) ?
These methods will move somewhere else when I do the rest of the "developer C" stuff. But I put them in the base classes directly for now, because I want the subclasses to be able to call them without qualification (i.e. the base classes will continue to have some forwarding arrangement so that the subclass doesn't need to care where the implementation is). > connect( action, SIGNAL(triggered()), this, SLOT(connection) ); I'm pretty sure that would not work (it would use the literal text "connection" as if it were the signature of the slot method). Also, some of the connections are to signals rather than slots, and in any case the saving would be minimal. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
