On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 13:50 -0700, Julie S wrote: > > What's happened is that I've only > > committed the new files this time. I > > didn't mean to. I understood that svn would recommit my > > changes to > > existing files. > I usually just list all of the files I want to commit. > > so if I was in trunk/rosegarden/src > > svn commit gui/dialogs/file.cpp gui/editors/file2.cpp > > I'm certain svn is automated in that respect and I don't have to do that. > But I've had good luck that way. Seems likely that would have worked (specifying the files that I wanted to commit - my local svn thought those were up-to-date because I'd already committed them). I'll remember that next time ... not that there'll be a next time since they've now solved the spam bug that caused all this in the first place.
> If you just have a few changes to commit to get the last one working then > just send those. Yeah, it will still be in the log, but that is okay as long > as the latest rev works. The clean build has completed OK. It's a little behind where I was last night but that's no big deal, at least it builds. I'll commit these now ... deep breath ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
