On 04/28/2010 10:05 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave Plater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> JFYI, I'm pushing 10.06 svn 11883 to 11.3 seeing as it fixes a couple of >> bugs and is very stable anyway. >> > Hang on -- careful there. Don't let it identify itself as > 10.06-something, because that'll be horribly confusing when 10.04.2 > comes out and is actually newer than it. > > Perhaps this is a good reason to have version numbers for development > snapshots be based on the prior release number rather than the > following one? > > > Chris > > If there's more to come after 11883 I'll wait, I'm still waiting on Michel to test anyway, I can only push a version update if it's a bug fix and I've two so far. We're on Milestone 6 which I was lead to believe is the first beta and I've got until around June 17th which is the first release candidate. I'm trying to have the latest version in 11.3. I don't use the .2 in 10.04.2 because it would confuse the hell out of the distro versioning system which updates the release number after every change. It's purely a cosmetic thing having 10.04 when 10.06 is released just after 11.3 is released doesn't look good. Dave P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
