On 23 June 2011 19:34, Arnout Engelen <rosegar...@bzzt.net> wrote:
> I remember dismissing my approach (adding notes directly to the Rosegarden
> data structures while parsing the XML, SAX-style) when I found out about
> some of the more advanced MusicXML constructs. However I haven't seen
> Niek's approach yet, and certainly don't want to discourage him even when
> he's also going this rout - perhaps I just gave up too soon :)

Indeed -- and actually I have a vague recollection I thought your
approach was workable for enough files to make it worth persisting
with, even if there would always be significant classes of files it
wouldn't support.


Chris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to