On 23 June 2011 19:34, Arnout Engelen <rosegar...@bzzt.net> wrote: > I remember dismissing my approach (adding notes directly to the Rosegarden > data structures while parsing the XML, SAX-style) when I found out about > some of the more advanced MusicXML constructs. However I haven't seen > Niek's approach yet, and certainly don't want to discourage him even when > he's also going this rout - perhaps I just gave up too soon :)
Indeed -- and actually I have a vague recollection I thought your approach was workable for enough files to make it worth persisting with, even if there would always be significant classes of files it wouldn't support. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel