On Thursday, May 31, 2012, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > found, this is probably a BUG". But now I think that's a red herring.
That particular warning has never pointed to anything interesting the entire time I've been here. > So up until "gthread-posix.c", I don't see anything abnormal. We don't > even use gthread-posix directly; we use Qt threads, which I assume call > it. I'm thinking it's a "bad" plugin somewhere, either LADSPA or DSSI. There have been issues with specific plugins in the past, though I don't have a list, and have no specific memory of what causes the issues. I seem to recall, and this is a *vague* recollection, that it always turns out to be the plugin not quite playing by the rules, rather than Rosegarden's implementation of all its stuff. Plugin issues are waaaaaaaaaay outside my limits though. I've never remotely worked on any of that code, and do not understand it at all. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
