On 01/10/2013 11:36 AM, Aere Greenway wrote:
> On 01/10/2013 11:30 AM, Ted Felix wrote:
>> On 01/10/2013 12:51 PM, Aere Greenway wrote:
>>> This morning, I obtained the svn source for the latest Rosegarden code
>>> (I was careful to do that this time), revision 13178.
>>> Unfortunately, it did not build successfully.
>>      Just to be sure, try the following in the rg directory:
>>
>>      $ svn update
>>      $ make distclean
>>      $ sh ./bootstrap.sh
>>
>>      If you are running 32-bit Ubuntu:
>>
>>      $ ./configure --enable-debug --with-qtlibdir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
>>
>>      For 64-bit Ubuntu:
>>
>>      $ ./configure --enable-debug --with-qtlibdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
>>
>>      Then finally try the make again
>>
>>      $ make
>>
>>      Hopefully that works.
>>
>> Ted.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
>> MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
>> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
>> MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rosegarden-devel mailing list
>> Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
>>
> Ted:
>
> Thanks for the ideas.
>
> I'll try it again this afternoon.
>
> It appears your WIKI on using the Eclipse IDE to work on Rosegarden
> (which I'm using, except I get the source the way you normally get the
> source, since I do not have a SourceForge user-ID), does not include the
> "svn update" step.
>
Ted, and all:

Good news!

I followed your instructions, and the build succeeded this time.

In the "make distclean" step this time, there were a lot more '.o' files 
removed than  before.  Or maybe I just got lucky this time..

Anyway, I now have a usable Rosegarden, with a lot of things fixed.

I generated it on Ubuntu, tested it there, and also tested it on Lubuntu 
(my primary system).  I am thinking that the executable can be used on 
any Ubuntu variant (with the same components/libraries installed), as 
long as it is the 32-bit version (which I generated).

If that is a reasonable assumption, then it should work on my friend's 
Ubuntu system (which I will upgrade for him soon).  I hope this is 
reasonable, because what comes with Ubuntu 12.04 has a lot of problems.

-- 
Sincerely,
Aere


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to