> Especially given that MIDI is a mere 31.25kbps. Or does MIDI > actually run faster now that it can travel over USB? (I bet no.)
I haven't done any measurements but would be *VERY* surprised if MIDI would force USB datarate to "a mere 31.25kbps". After all MIDI as invented ages ago is the name for two different things: 1) an encoding scheme or logical protocol (the MIDI msgs and codes we use for Note On/Off, Volume, SYSEX etc. pp.) 2) a HW specification with plugs, wires and physical clock It seems quite obvious that "MIDI via USB" while belonging into the HW department is something completely different from 2) as of above and thus I don't see why it would be limited in clock (which would have no benefit whatsoever anyway). However I'm sure this could be found in the net somewhere :) Just my 0.02 €, Michael -- Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
