On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 10:12 AM, David Faure wrote: > How about I rename --no-sequencer to --no-sound, so we have only one > concept (I would then merge isSoundEnabled() and isSequencerRunning() > since it's the same concept).
"--no-sequencer" dates from when the sequencer was a separate process rather than a separate thread. IIRC it essentially meant "don't start the sequencer process, and ignore any actions that would normally depend on it". I think it was mainly useful on systems where the soundcard configuration wasn't working properly, so as to edit a composition without having to fix your ALSA config. It seems fair enough to me to merge it with "--no-sound", giving one option that basically means "don't try to open any of the system-specific sound drivers". Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
