On 02/28/2017 07:08 PM, David Faure wrote: > I vote for killing all this blockSignals(true) usage,
I second this. I've been removing every blockSignals() that I come across. So, if you can get rid of it, please do. > but the question is what > happens then. In my quick test (start with cmdline arg, then open another > doc), it all seems to work fine without the above code, but presumably it was > added for a reason? That was so long ago.... We've restructured a lot of stuff in the meantime and it's entirely possible that it's safe to do away with it. I vaguely recall simplifying some of the code related to doc/view swapping, so I might have shuffled things the right way. I'll take a peek at the mailing lists around this time and see if I can find out what the test case was for the commit that introduced this. Ted. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
