On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, at 11:43, Chris Cannam wrote: > [S] V670 The uninitialized class member 'm_intervals' is used to > initialize the 'm_size' member. Remember that members are initialized in > the order of their declarations inside a class. Tuning.cpp 394 > First one to be attributable to Michael, I think. The author mentions > that this is not common - I thought that compilers warned about it, > which would explain why it's not common but not why this example > persisted.
Think I was misled by svn there - not Michael's code but an "external submission". Also, this isn't picked up by the compiler because the problem is not that the initialisers have a different order from the declarations, but that the declaration order is already wrong for the dependencies involved. Chris _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
