On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 19:19:00 -1000 david <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/18/20 3:26 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Whenever a midi instrument is used to lay down a midi track (next imported > > into RG) there are the inevitable inconsistancies like an 8th note repeated > > in the next bar becomes a 16th plus a 16th rest. Is there a way to clean > > this up by asking RG to feed rests of a certain duration or less to > > adjoining notes to be absorbed? Or, if that's impossible then simply not > > show them although this would lead to quantization issues? (I'm trying top > > produce sensible sheet music) > > I hit that all the time. I'm not as precise a player as the timing > resolution MIDI offers and don't keep tempo very well. ("You've got a > natural swing," my classical piano instructor told me, and it took a lot > of work to overcome it!) > > Same about the 16th note + 16th rest. MIDI timing says we released the > 16th note before it should have ended (for a 16th note at that tempo). > My main MIDI keyboard is pretty dusty, so I wouldn't be surprised if > that's sometimes being caused by accumulated dust in the switches. I get mine already digitized into a midi, then I work it over in RG. The guy who does the midi track is a pro but still, I think it's near impossible to consistently hit poerfect 16th except with a slow tempo. This shouild maybe be a job for the midi instrument, to use only durations X-Y for notes/rests. I mean sheet music is usually rudimentary and doesn't have to be microsecond precise, that's left to execution and interpretation (i think). > RG people - isn't there a setting that tells RG NOT to tie notes across > bar lines? I think there is, somewhere in the prefs labyrinth, ran into it the other day -- Artificial Stupidity will never be competitive _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
