You might want to take a look at
https://github.com/thanks4opensource/rosegarden-fork. It implements
almost all of Feature Request #535, albeit in a slightly different
workflow. Also the capabilities of #537 and #536, again with workflows
divergent from your proposed designs.
I agree that markers are very useful and their implementation in
mainstream Rosegarden is limiting. That, among many other reasons, is
why I made rosegarden-fork. ;) ;)
On 9/1/25 1:04 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
I've just added 3 feature requests [1], which I've kept separate as they
are quite independent, but essentially aim at improving marker
usability (IMHO of course!).
I'm not sure how many users actually use markers, but I've been using
them more recently for longer / more complex pieces and do think they
are quite helpful for moving around a piece, quickly locating sections
and also quickly creating / activating 'loop regions' (especially if
#357 gets implemented) :-)
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
