+1 we should do this now.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM Paul Hoogsteder <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, I think we should go ahead with this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Hoogsteder.
>
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:00, Job Snijders <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for putting together an impact analysis! I believe this write-up
> by RIPE NCC demonstrates the staff have a good understanding of the policy
> proposal.
>
> As one of the proposers, I believe that (short of deleting RIPE-NONAUTH
> entirely) this proposal is gentle and sane mechanism to incrementally clean
> up the un-validated RIPE-NONAUTH data source.
>
> I look forward to hearing the groups’ thoughts on how to proceed.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 15:24, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> Policy proposal 2018-06, "RIPE NCC IRR Database Non-Authoritative Route
>> Object Clean-up", is now in the Review Phase.
>>
>> The goal of the proposal is to delete an non-authoritative object stored
>> in the RIPE IRR, if it conflicts with an RPKI ROA.
>>
>> The proposal has been updated following the last round of discussion and
>> is now at version v3.0. Some of the differences from version v2.0 include:
>> - Provides details about the process how to identify and solve conflicts
>>
>> The RIPE NCC has prepared an impact analysis on this latest proposal
>> version to support the community’s discussion. You can find the full
>> proposal and impact analysis at:
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-06
>>
>> And the draft documents at:
>> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-06/draft
>>
>> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
>> four week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, taking
>> the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full draft
>> RIPE Policy Document.
>>
>> At the end of the Review Phase, the Working Group (WG) Chairs will
>> determine whether the WG has reached rough consensus. It is therefore
>> important to provide your opinion, even if it is simply a restatement of
>> your input from the previous phase.
>>
>> We encourage you to read the proposal, impact analysis and draft
>> document and send any comments to <[email protected]> before 12
>> September 2019.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Marco Schmidt
>> Policy Officer
>> RIPE NCC
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to