> Why do we suspect there are many of them? being among the guilty, i take tassos's point.
> And whether they are beacons or not, why treat them any different? > Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose? :-) no, the opposite, assuming the purpose is rov deloyment. tassos's point was that prudent providers considering dropping invalids will measure first. and noise from researchers et alia may cause the op to think they will drop useful prefixes. trying to think of how to ameliorate this, it may be a case for your beloved communities. but nothing fancy or complex, please. randy
