On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:17 AM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I really think we need to move in the IETF on rsync deprecation. > > you have it backward > > first you need to fix rrdp so it does not do things such as serve out of > baliwick data.
To refresh the stack, can you give me an instance please? > then you need to fix operational deployment. Thats work-in-progress. We were hoping to move on a process design to get there, while we finish that deployment. Almost all children NOT in hosted, are RRDP active. I would be very surprised if the majority use case now, is not RRDP active. > then you can measure the net to be sure everybody is serving rrdp properly. That sounds like a fine activity for somebody ELSE to do, to me. >then you can blah blah blah in the ietf. Well.. I think we have draft in blah blah blah. And, we have worked to get everyone to be running it visibly. And, I think the measurement is a nice hole for somebody to fill. > > but we have had this discussion before. Yea, I know, but the problem is we've arrived at needing to boost resiliency against scale, and rsync is a really poor fit for the problem because of the fact most CDN choices are tuned for HTTP and not arbitrary TCP protocols. cheers -G > > randy
